Archive for the 'Journalism' Category

h1

Review: The Gum Thief

February 26, 2008

The Gum Thief by Douglas Coupland. Bloomsbury, €15
Published November 11th, 2007, Sunday Business Post. Review by Alex Meehan.

Visiting Douglas Coupland’s smart Alec imagination isn’t for everyone, but in The Gum Thief, he delivers a witty, clever compelling indictment of modern employment while also saying something interesting about the fundamental sameness of people.

If nothing else, this is also an original book. Its structure is unique, with three intersecting perspectives competing equally for our attention and a storyline that brings together a middle-aged man with a cynical twenty-something woman who find common ground in their cynical, jaded view of the world.

First off we meet Roger, a divorced and reluctantly middle aged ’sales associate’ at a Staples office supplies store. Roger is a barely functioning alcoholic hiding from the real world in his yellow pack job while secretly keeping a journal that details the minute detail of his non-existence. In it, he delights in writing about how much he despises the other zombie-like employees of Staples and how angry he has become at the fact that life has left him behind.

The story begins when Roger’s journal is accidentally found by his co-worker Bethany, a 26-year-old goth who wears black lipstick and lives at home with her overbearing and overweight mother. Bethany discovers that not only has Roger been writing about her and her fellow co-workers, he’s also been writing mock diary entries pretending to be her.

Disturbed but strangely compelled, Bethany writes back and a relationship starts in which Roger and Bethany leave each other entries in the journal describing each other’s jaded view of life while also occasionally writing entries using the other person’s supposed perspective.

To make matters more complicated, weaving in and out of these main diary entries are chapters from Roger’s stalled novel Glove Pond, as well as occasional notes from Bethany’s mother and Roger’s ex-wife.

We learn that Roger started Glove Pond - modelled after ‘Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf?’ -years previously when he still had serious ambitions to be writer, but since the death of his son and the break-up of his marriage, he’s stalled not just on the book also on his life.

Unlike Bethany and the other short term employees at Staples doing summer jobs or filling in time before going to college, he’s a lifer and so gets away with drinking on the job and general all-round slacker behaviour. Both Roger and Bethany delight in petty theft, and so Staples suffers while they act out their sense of outsider indignity on a faceless corporation.

Coupland has done something difficult with The Gum Thief - taking the humdrum banality of chain store, mass market parking lot life and make it larger than life. The unusual structure works quite well and contrary to what you might expect, isn’t confusing at all.

This is a clever, smart, witty and entertaining book, the 12th from Coupland since his seminal 1994 novel Generation X. The Gum Thief follows confidently from this as well as his more recent successes Microserfs and JPod, offering something new and interesting while also differing enough to show a progression.

h1

Review: Death Message

February 13, 2008

DEATH MESSAGE. By Mark Billingham, Brown, €15.00.
Published September 9th, 2007, The Sunday Business Post. Review by Alex Meehan

When it comes to creating fictional detectives, there are some basic rules of thumb that the majority of authors adhere to. Generally, fictional crime fighters should be middle-aged and, thanks to their love of coffee and junk food, a bit on the porky side.

They should have difficulty dealing with authority figures, and should always be prepared to go their own way when it comes to investigating crime, even if it means bending the rules to breaking point.

Finally – and this is imperative – they should find it virtually impossible to sustain a successful relationship due to their workaholic tendencies and the fact that underneath all their macho bravado, they are essentially tortured souls.

It’s a tried and tested formula that has worked brilliantly for authors like Ian Rankin (John Rebus) and Colin Dexter (Inspector Morse), and now English author Mark Billingham is staking his claim with Tom Thorne. Death Message is Billingham’s seventh Thorne novel; the first, Sleepyhead, was published in 2001.

It can take quite some time for a crime author to build up a large fan base – this is one of the most saturated of all literary genres — but the payback is that when they do, these new fans will generally buy up their entire back catalogue. On the basis of Death Message, there are some few readers who will probably do just that, although others may still require some persuading.

Billingham has taken the title of his book from the term used by police who have to break the news to families that a loved one has been killed, and the novel opens with three policemen doing just that to Marcus Brooks, a convicted killer who is two weeks away from being released from jail.

Fast forward a few weeks and Tom Thorne receives a message on his mobile phone containing a photograph of a recently murdered man. Another photo follows shortly afterwards, but it’s with the third message – video footage of an as yet unharmed fellow cop – that the plot really picks up pace and Thorne finds himself drawn into Marcus Brooks’ unrelenting but meticulously planned quest for revenge.

Brooks is easily the book’s most interesting character and through him Billingham provides great insight into the mind of a man for whom the loss of his partner and son has proved unbearable.

Unable to sleep for longer than two or three hours each night – and then only in ten to fifteen minute bursts – Brooks spends his nights walking the streets of London, taking comfort from the simple mundanity of putting one foot in front of the other.

In a series of letters to his dead partner Angie, he recounts tales of his new life, interspersed with reminiscences about their time together and his current mission to avenge her death. In time Brooks takes Thorne increasingly into his confidence, eventually claiming that he was framed for his original crime by a fellow copper.

There’s no doubt that Mark Billingham has produced a well-paced, exciting crime novel with plenty of twists, but with the exception of Brooks many of his characters are unsympathetic and uninteresting. In particular Thorne’s girlfriend Louise is difficult to warm to, while his best friend Phil Hendricks, a gay pathologist, doesn’t really feature enough for us to us to get to know him very well.

In Tom Thorne, Billingham has the makings of a great crime detective, but he will need to pay more attention to character development before he joins the ranks of Rebus and Dexter. However there’s certainly enough merit in Death Message to suggest that it may not be too long before he does so.

h1

All hail King Fry!

October 22, 2007

The intellectual and comedic colossus that is Stephen Fry has a blog. It’s new and only has two or three things on it, but because it’s Fry and not an ordinary human being, the few entries that are there so far are many, many thousands of words long, enourmously significant and massively entertaining. I think we should crown Fry king of humanity in an absolute monarchy and be done with. You know it would make sense. Eventually.

Anyway, if you haven’t been, you should. And if like me you have, you may find you slink away from Fry’s blog experiencing mild depression as a result of the realisation that you are in fact an insignificant carbuncle on the backside of literary expression.

If you’re also like me, you’ll also find your self slinking back, unable to stay away. Drats.

h1

Dumbledore is what now?

October 21, 2007

Apparantly Dumbledore is gay. Seriously.

JK Rowling “. . . made her revelation to a packed house in New York’s Carnegie Hall on Friday, as part of her US book tour.

She took audience questions and was asked if Dumbledore found “true love”. “Dumbledore is gay,” she said, adding he was smitten with rival Gellert Grindelwald, who he beat in a battle between good and bad wizards long ago.

Well, call me old fashioned, but I think if it’s not in the book, it’s not in the story. Did anyone think Dumbledore was ‘playing for the other team’ when they read the books? No, didn’t think so. So, can an author radically revise aspects of a published story by adding verbally later on key information?

Well, they can - and Rowling has - but I think that’s a king-sized cop out. If it’s in black ink on white paper, it’s in the story. If it’s not, it’s not.

As to the nature of the information - that Dumbledore is gay - I suppose it doesn’t mean anything really. It’s a fact of life that a certain percentage of the population is gay. Anyone living in the real world knows that. Unless I missed something in the books, at no point are we told there are no gay people in Harry’s world, so why would we presume otherwise?

Some critics have given Rowling a hard time because this aspect of the character didn’t come out more prominently (or at all) in the books and films - I’d guess they would have liked Dumbledore to have a gay lover ensconced at Hogwarts, to make a point. But isn’t this a children’s story, albeit one that appeals to adults as well? Did Rowling wuss out of showing Dumbledore being gay? No, I don’t think she did. I think it was totally irrelevant to the story, and it would have been fairly offensive tokenism to concoct such a subplot merely to be politically correct. Don’t you think?

h1

It’s a what, now?

October 10, 2007

So back from Japan and there are quite a few blog entries on the way, as I get the time. The first thing I’m moved to blog about is the new Sony Rolly. Myself and Jason spent a full twenty minutes standing in front of a kiosk in an electronics store in Japan looking at a promotional video of the rolly.

rolly1-custom.jpg

Really. Twenty minutes - twenty full minutes - spent watching a video of the rolly doing what rollys do. Exactly what that is, I’m afraid I can’t tell you, because I still don’t know. Which is why we spent so long looking at it. I couldn’t decide if this was some sort of cross cultural misunderstanding - maybe Japanese people ‘get it’ instantly - or marketing genius along the lines of “let’s make the promos so ambigous, it will keep people guessing!”

It seems to be some sort of music player, except it lights up, pulses colours, dances and has bluetooth functions. But quite what it is or why you’d want it I’m not sure. The Japanese promo videos feature children dancing with their rollys, couple snuggling in bed with their rolly, and people meditating beside their rolly. Apparently you can programme your rolly to dance in specific ways, and then share your dance programmes across the net with your rolly-owning friends. Quite why you would want to do this, I don’t know but this does come from the same culture that brought us the virtual pet in the form of the tamagotchi so who can say?

Either Sony has invented something so totally and uterly redundent and useless that nobody will buy it and it will go the way of the Sinclair C5 or in fact, Sony has come up with an entirely new and original kind of personal electronics.

h1

Catwalk fabulous . . .

August 29, 2007

So my incredibly talanted sister Deborah* and her guru-like husband Charlie had a triumph last night (in the Latin sense of the word) when they held their first catwalk fashion show in Dublin city at the uber-trendy Fallon & Byrne on Wicklow Street. Deborah and her friend Aideen Bodkin have worked in fashion for a long time, but decided to hold a show together during Dublin Fashion Week and it appears they are the Hotted Things in Town(tm) right now.

The show was thronged - absolutely packed out with journalists, fashion buyers, models and supporters. A couple of hundred people packed in to watch the show and they weren’t disappointed. I don’t know a huge amount about fashion, but I was blown away by the creativity and talent on display. And it seems that the press in attendence were too.

This morning, there is more newsprint dedicated to this show than I’ve ever seen for any publicity event, let alone fashion show. There is acres of coverage in The Irish Indendent, The Irish Times, The Examiner, The Daily Mail, Herald AM and probably more I haven’t seen.

This fantastic picture was published in a huge print on page two of today’s Irish Independent. (I hope the photographer who took it doesn’t mind me ‘borrowing’ it temporarily for non commercial use!) Whoo hoo! Congrats Debs!

veale.jpg

(*For the record, all my family are fabulously talented in their respective fields.)

h1

Review: HP & The Deathly Hallows

August 8, 2007

HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS. By JK Rowling, Bloomsbury, €13.30.
Published July 28th, 2007, The Sunday Business Post. Review by Alex Meehan

And so it ends. Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows is the seventh and final novel in JK Rowling’s monumentally successful series and, for hardcore Potter fans, this is the most eagerly awaited of them all.

The good news is that Rowling has delivered a satisfying conclusion to the story she started writing 17 years ago, although not everyone will be happy with the outcome.

deathlyhallows.jpg

At the start of the final book, Harry is reeling from the death of his mentor Albus Dumbledore and is struggling to carry out his last wishes, that he should track down and destroy a set of horocruxes - magical artefacts used by arch enemy Lord Voldemort to store portions of his twisted soul.

Harry, Ron and Hermione leave Hogwarts School, where Severus Snape has been installed as headmaster and start a long and difficult journey to find the location of the crucial objects and the means of destroying them.

In the meantime, the wizarding world has been thrown into chaos as Lord Voldemort has taken power, overthrown the Ministry of Magic and installs his followers in positions of authority. He instigates a policy of rounding up and killing wizards of mixed magical parentage and sinister ‘snatch squads’ roam the countryside looking for ‘mudbloods’ to imprison.

Really though, he is mostly concerned with hunting down Potter, and the stage is set for a final climactic showdown with the Dark Lord, as both Potter and Voldemort know one has to die for the other to live.

The body count in Deathly Hallows is significantly higher than in previous Potter books, and several well-loved characters meet their end during the course of the story. The emotional impact is high and it is clear Rowling has honed her craft over the course of the series. This is a well written book featuring well-loved characters risking their all.

There is a definite sense of foreboding as it becomes clear any character can go at any time, and the story is more gripping for it. In previous books, we have seen Harry grow from a child to a moody teenager and the bad news is that he is still stuck there.

When people are trying to help him, he’s unreasonable and quick to anger.

His can’t resist lashing out with his tongue and the result is that it is hard to stay supportive of a lead character who doesn’t always deserve the respect others give him. A crucial part of the journey Harry takes lies in his coming to terms with the failings of others.

His respect for Dumbledore crumbles as tabloid hack Rita Skeeter releases a book titled The Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore, which is designed to smear the now-deceased Hogwarts headmaster. Through Skeeter’s one-sided hatchet job, Harry finds out that his hero has not been entirely honest with him about his past, and starts to doubt the validity of his quest.

Deathly Hallows is a satisfying read for any fan of Rowling’s work. All the characters given prominence in the previous books make fresh appearances, and unresolved plotlines are brought to fruition. It contains everything the previous books had - and more.

It weighs in at a hefty 600 pages and while there are problems with elements of the story - the plot is overly long and convoluted - overall it is an exciting, fast-moving story with a well-written and satisfying climax.

The epilogue brings the story full circle, and reminds the reader that, while this started out as a children’s story, it became so much more. This is a worthy finale for a series that has become a publishing phenomenon.

h1

Review: HP & the Order of the Phoenix

August 2, 2007

Sunday, July 15, 2007 - Reviewed by Alex Meehan
Directed by David Yates, At cinemas nationwide, cert 12A.

Is there anything worse than not being believed when you’re telling the truth? For Harry Potter in the Order of the Phoenix, the answer is no. A plot exists to persuade the wizarding world that Harry and his champion, Hogwarts headmaster Albus Dumbledore, are mistaken in their claims that arch-enemy Lord Voldemort has returned.

order-the-phoenix.jpg

Instead, spin doctors at the Ministry of Magica re claiming that Dumbledore is intent on overthrowing the government and that Harry is exaggerating the truth to make himself look good. Concerned by Dumbledore’s influence over impressionable minds at Hogwarts, the Ministry sends the fantastically ruthless Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton) to act as a defence against the dark arts teacher and to keep an eye on things.

Umbridge decrees that there is no threat and therefore no need to practice practical magic, so Harry is chosen by the students to secretly train them in defensive magic. Together, they form Dumbledore’s army, but things take a sinister turn when Umbridge discovers the training sessions and uses them to oust Dumbledore as headmaster.

The Order of the Phoenix is the fifth book in the Harry Potter series and it marks a change of tone for both the film and the book franchise. It’s darker, there’s less comedy, and Harry is at a difficult age where he is faced with ‘‘adult’’ problems. The trouble with casting children in the lead roles of a film franchise is that a cute child on screen in the first movie does not necessarily turn into a competent actor by the fifth instalment.

Nor are they cute enough to compensate for second-rate performances - and in terms of acting, this film is more demanding than its predecessors. Add to this the awkward fact that the supporting cast includes the gargantuan talents of Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Michael Gambon and Ralph Fiennes.

Read the rest of this review here.

h1

Harry’s back

July 25, 2007

I feel like I’m temporarily living in Potter land. In what may actually be the highlight of of career so far, I managed to get into press screenings of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and to get to review the new Deathly Hallows book. Between writing up both of these things, I have spent a fair bit of time being paid to read and munch popcorn.

poster.jpg

Nice one! I’ll post the relevant articles here in a few days. I need to allow a decent amount of time to elapse between their print publication and their appearence here.

h1

Author interview: Paul Johnston

July 17, 2007

I met crime writer Paul Johnstone a few weeks ago for a very pleasent few hours in the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin to shoot the breeze over his new book. The resulting interview was published in The Sunday Business Post.

Enjoy.

First Person: Johnston bounces back
Sunday, July 08, 2007 - By Alex Meehan

Crime writer Paul Johnston could have been forgiven for giving up his writing career and trying his hand at something else. After all, not everyone could work through writer’s block, being dumped by their publisher, losing their agent, having their marriage fail and, to top it all off, contracting a virulent form of cancer.

Yet this is exactly what the Scottish writer did. He battled all these setbacks to regain his health, find love again and have his ninth novel, The Death List, published. Johnston is back and this time he’s armed with a sense of conviction and a willingness to go places other authors shy away from.

The Death List is a page turner and, with the right push, it could be the novel to take Johnston’s career to new heights. It’s a gritty and violent thriller, set in London, pitting a crime novelist against a psychotic serial killer named the White Devil.

There’s an uncanny resemblance between Johnston and his latest protagonist, Matt Wells - he too is recently divorced, has writer’s block and has been dropped by his publisher. Surprisingly, he claims the resemblance is mostly coincidental.

‘‘Is Matt based on me? No, not really,’’ Johnston says.

‘‘At least I didn’t plan it that way and anyway, there’s nothing much in that for a writer unless you mess your characters around to have fun. Really, this is a book about the nature of revenge.”

In the story, Matt is depicted as a writer best known for his short-lived series of detective novels set in Albania - a dig at Johnston’s own Alex Mavros series of Greek detective stories.

‘‘If anyone thinks they’re featured in the book and that I’ve treated them badly, then at least I’ve also made fun of myself. Satire doesn’t take any prisoners - it goes for you as the writer as well.”

Johnston was also inspired by his interest in Jacobean literature - his bad guy is named after John Webster’s tragedy The White Devil - and by the visceral nature of the urge to seek revenge experienced by people who perceive themselves wronged.

‘‘Everyone feels like knifing their boss or strangling their wife at some point, and urban myths abound featuring angry wives exacting revenge on their adulterous husbands by pouring honey in their petrol tanks or spurned au pairs phoning the speaking clock in Australia and leaving the phone off the hook,” says Johnston.

‘‘In many ways, revenge like this is quite childish, but the urge fulfils a basic human need.

‘‘The problems start when people seek to do serious harm, like the White Devil in the book. That was the premise on which I based this story - I wanted to investigate that.”

While Johnston’s books have never been lacking in violent content, The Death List is notably darker in this regard.

The author underwent serious surgery to battle the cancer he was diagnosed with in 2003. The resulting operation to remove a kidney and surrounding tissue left him scarred and thoughtful.

‘‘Without trying to get too precious about it, I think the violence in this book is a reflection of the real world.

‘‘We do live in a violent world and I was shocked when I came out of hospital and saw what had been done to me on the operating table.

‘‘My books have never been for shrinking violets in terms of violence, but this personal experience made me more concerned to be very open about it, perhaps in a slightly disturbing way. I think this is the real world.

‘‘It’s the same here. I read an Irish paper this morning at breakfast and there was a story about how some kid had been stabbed, and someone else had been shot, and a house was blown up,” says Johnston.

‘‘At home, I have a one-and-a-half-year-old child and I spend a lot of time changing the TV channels because at any minute incredible violence from the streets of Baghdad or Gaza can appear on the screen, complete with bodies and severed limbs,” he says.

‘‘It’s up to each individual how much they want to take on. Some people will watch a movie like Seven and think it’s disgusting, and others won’t be bothered at all.

‘‘Hopefully, reading books like mine is a reasonably cathartic experience, because there’s certainly an element of writing these books that’s cathartic.

‘‘Confronting your fears robs them of power and we all go through unpleasant experiences, but that’s all part of the experience of life.

‘‘If you consciously try to stay away from horror movies, crime novels or violence on the news, you are cutting yourself off from a large part of real life. The role of death in life.”

Johnston argues that there’s nothing unhealthy about reading about the darker aspects of the human condition, as it can act as a release.

‘‘I do think crime writers have some responsibility in what they write, but when people read novels, they are capable of accepting that, while it may be a reflection of society, it’s not the real world,” he says.

‘‘Violence can also be entertaining in a dark way. I’m sure many people will remember seeing the movie Pulp Fiction in the cinema - the part where they accidentally shoot the guy in the car - everybody laughs. I’ve seen it since and I still laughed.

‘‘Sure it’s violent and revolting, but it’s also funny.”

Johnston has setout to deliberately write a commercial novel in The Death List and is unapologetic about the appeal of his books and their place in the publishing world.

‘‘I certainly don’t have a problem with the idea of commercial writing, but many people do, particularly in the world of literature.

‘‘Crime writers tend to be fairly down to earth types, because at the end of the day you’re trying to sell books and I’ve never understood why anyone would write a book if they didn’t want it to be popular and sell.

‘‘This was a deliberate attempt to write a page turner - I like reading page turners - but it’s not the easiest thing to do.

‘‘People tend to be dismissive of popular authors like James Patterson as if their commercial appeal makes them lesser writers, but in fact writing this kind of fast-paced book is difficult.”

The publishing world has been both cruel and kind to Johnston.

On one hand, he’s had eight other books published, has won awards for his writing and was able to turn professional after just his second novel.

On the other hand, he wrote three full books before being published for the first time in 1997 and, before The Death List, he was dropped by his publisher.

‘‘In my case, the reason was that my editor left the publishing house I was signed to and suddenly there was nobody in-house to champion my work. Understandably, everyone else just looks at the bottom line.”

Having worked in business in the past, the author says he can see why publishers would question the wisdom of keeping him on board, but believes there are other ways to deal with the issue rather than just dumping the author.

Johnston feels it would be better for the industry if publishers put more time into fostering talent and advising writers who aren’t hitting the mark on how to tweak their work.

‘‘I think this is a journey that all writers have to undertake at some stage,” he says.

‘‘Ian Rankin is a case in point - he’s a successful writer, but was close to being dropped in 1997; about a week later he won the Golden Dagger and since then his career has been in permanent lift-off.”

According to Johnston, publishing companies have decided not to build authors in the way they did in the past.

‘‘In literary fiction it’s not so bad - if they see someone at the age of 25 who they think may win the Booker Prize in 15 years’ time, then they probably will support them, but they certainly won’t pay them much, unless it’s obvious Zadie Smith-style material.

‘‘With genre fiction that definitely doesn’t happen. They do the sums on every book.

‘‘From an author or an agent’s perspective, this is simple - potentially any book that’s published can make money.

‘‘Perhaps not much, but people will always sell 3,000 or 5,000 copies.

‘‘Also, generally speaking, most publishing companies write off advances anyway,” says Johnston.

In order to stay published, Johnston says most authors now have to write certain kinds of books.

‘‘That’s where things get sticky, because no genre fiction writer is comfortable with the idea of being told what to write. It might not be an explicit order, but heavy hints are dropped and it’s generally made known to the author that certain types of books will be more welcome than others.

‘‘This doesn’t bother me, because I’ve never understood why an author would want to write books that wouldn’t sell anyway. That’s bonkers.

‘‘I’ve always wanted my books to be as widely read as possible, even if I haven’t always been my own best ally in that.”

Taken from The Sunday Business Post